Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 321 - 340
of 15,258
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2008, 7:16 am
Adam Liptak wrote about the impending Supreme Court argument in Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 6:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 7:16 am
You can read a case which talks about this issue in Denmark v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 9:27 am
": "The figure behind controversial business schemes has failed in his bid to gain control of the .com internet address consisting of his name. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 10:13 am
" At which point you can pretty much figure out where the rest of this one's going.There's a dissent as well, and as between Judges Rymer and Pregerson, you can easily intuit which one's writing the majority opinion and which one's writing on the bottom side.Personally, I didn't think plaintiffs here had much of a shot anyways. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 2:30 pm
Or I can just tell you the facts and let you figure out what's fair. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm
Yesterday we mentioned that a suit had been filed in the Southern District of New York by a number of commentators and public figures, arguing that the NDAA’s detention provisions will apply to them in their “daily professional work” and that they could be detained under the provisions. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 12:56 pm
Yesterday’s oral argument before the Supreme Court was most notable in the collapsing of the false narrative used by many Democratic senators and media figures in the Barrett confirmation that the Affordable Care Act was close to being overturned in the case of California v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 12:52 pm
An appeal from consolidated tax evasion cases that (for some reason I can't figure out) was filed in 2005 and yet not resolved until 2012.Jean-Claude also argued the appeal in this published opinion from Friday. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 7:05 am
There are few figures historically who were trusted more by families than Catholic priests. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 12:25 pm
Judge Lucy Koh, the federal judge presiding over two Apple v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 11:32 am
Wade was a case in which a result was reached, and the majority had to figure out a way to justify it. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 4:39 am
I witnessed a television debate where two important public figures argued with one another C-I-V-I-L-L-Y. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 10:00 pm
In what one of our colleagues called a "billion dollar roll of the dice," review was granted in Miller v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 10:07 am
Unlike the cases cited by the dissent, where the plaintiffs sought publicity regarding the public controversies which were the subject of their litigation (Winklevoss v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 11:44 am
And I had to read a lot of pages just to figure it out.But then it all made sense.North Dakota wasn't the plaintiff to begin with. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 1:06 pm
Earlier this week the poll closed on a simple question: is there a likelihood of confusion between these two figurative marks? [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 2:07 pm
They let the Court of Appeal figure this one out on its own.Right call. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Mossman v. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 2:28 pm
I suppose that even with my limited knowledge of Latin roots, I should have been able to figure out what it was before the third page of the opinion. [read post]
