Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 321 - 340 of 15,322
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2023, 2:26 am by Rose Hughes
The original application was no more than 20 pages in length and didn't include any data, examples or figures. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
The Claimant was not a public figure for the purposes of the caselaw on section 4. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 10:18 am by Eleonora Rosati
Copyright Office’s Review Board in A Recent Entry to Paradise, Zarya of the Dawn [IPKat here and here], and the District Court judgement in Thaler v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 1:23 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit’s new claim construction decision in Monterey Research, v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 3:26 am by Frank Cranmer
That was the question before the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta in Wirring v Law Society of Alberta 2023 ABKB 580 (CanLII). [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 3:51 am by jonathanturley
Moreover, the courts have rejected the use of exclusion in Powell v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 8:46 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Helitech Civil Construction: A Clarification of Public Figures In a significant decision, the Illinois Supreme Court in Daniel v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Michelle
 The US Supreme Court granted certiorari to answer that question in Corner Post v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Noel Semple
Police officers accused of misconduct, for example, are often suspended with pay, at a six-figure salary, pending the final hearing of their matters. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 7:46 am by Jocelyn Bosse
If you've been too busy pumpkin shopping to keep up with the latest news, don't worry - the IPKat is here to bring you up to speed.PatentsThis Kat hasn't quite got the hang of carving Jack-O-LanternsKatfriend Léon Dijkman provided an update about 10X Genomics v Nanostring - the first-ever injunction decision by the new Unified Patent Court (UPC). [read post]