Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 361 - 380
of 13,847
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2012, 4:33 am
Regina v Barnett; [2011] EWCA Crim 2936; [2011] WLR (D) 385 “In relation to proceedings in which a defendant’s benefit from general criminal conduct was assessed the court was ‘entitled’ to make the assumptions provided for in section 10 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 even if the prosecution had not given the written preliminary notice provided for in section 71(2) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 10:39 am
Okay, this may be a stretch in figuring out how this relates to criminal law (other than the fact that I'm attending the debate tonight along with another criminal defense attorney), but for those interested, NBC's emergency petition for a writ of prohibition to the Nevada Supreme Court is available on-line. [read post]
9 May 2012, 4:25 am
Now the Patent Office and the courts have the unenviable task of trying to figure out what the Supreme Court really meant in Mayo v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 12:55 pm
See if you can figure out in advance how this is going to end:"Eighty-seven-year-old Griffin lived alone in a home in San Diego. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 1:16 pm
This is a pretty good opinion to figure out where you generally stand on the resentencing provisions of Section 1172.6, which "amend[ed] the felony murder rule and the natural and probable consequences doctrine, as it relates to murder, to ensure that murder liability is not imposed on a person who is not the actual killer, did not act with the intent to kill, or was not a major participant in the underlying felony who acted with reckless indifference to human life. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 10:33 am
"At that point, you (1) know what the case is about, and (2) can figure out the approximate sentence.And you'd be right. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 1:48 pm
No one could really figure out what the right legal theory (or jury instructions) should be. [read post]
3 May 2016, 11:47 am
Make that a command.When you make a CCP 998 settlement offer, you can (obviously) include a specific dollar figure that you'll accept (or pay), but you can't include the condition that the party execute "a written settlement agreement and general release. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 10:52 am
So, the next best thing, I figured, would be to have a little fun with the Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:15 am
Adams was a key figure in the start of the revolt against the British. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 9:05 pm
Figures, 2012 U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:19 am
The most recent judicial libel damages were awarded in Elliott v Flanagan £48,750 after mitigation and Coulter v Sunday Newspapers Limited, £50,000. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 4:02 pm
The most recent judicial libel damages were awarded in Elliott v Flanagan £48,750 after mitigation and Coulter v Sunday Newspapers Limited,£50,000 overturned on appeal. [read post]
5 May 2015, 2:16 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union gave judgment today in Cases T-423/12, T-183/13 and T-184/13 Skype Ultd v OHIM. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 10:56 am
Aktiebolaget Karlstads Mekaniska Werkstad v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:18 am
Each week, a different figure will be featured. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 4:41 am
A JUDGMENT IN PARR V. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:50 am
We looked at the underlying decisions in this case, and are still scratching our figurative head here. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:32 am
A few observations from reading numerous FOSTA cases: sex trafficking victim cases are horrifying. courts cannot figure out how to interpret FOSTA. due to FOSTA’s ambiguities, judges are turning to judicial activism to favor victims regardless of the law. the doctrinal errors judges are making in FOSTA cases may migrate into standard Section 230 jurisprudence, which would cause significant problems for UGC that Congress thought FOSTA wouldn’t reach. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:54 am
Apple v. [read post]
