Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 41 - 60
of 15,327
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am
But whatever the law means, we can probably assume that the trade mark RED BULL, and the same trade mark owner's figurative trade marks (what normal people would call logos) or at least some of them, have reputations. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 10:14 am
So what can Apple/Mr Jobs' estate do if InIcon were to market and sell the action figure in the United Kingdom? [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 3:17 am
” In Elsten v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 8:12 am
"This Alabama Judge Has Figured Out How to Dismantle Roe v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:00 am
Jordan v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:00 am
Jordan v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 12:30 am
Apparently, there was someone else in it, although the facts were disputed and/or so poorly set out in the article that it's hard to figure out just what happened. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 4:56 am
Last week's Court of Appeal judgment in Metrobus v UNITE must make frustrating reading for the union's officials: it upholds King J's grant of an injunction preventing bus drivers from striking in Croydon, Crawley and Orpington last autumn on the basis, firstly that UNITE had not promptly informed Metrobus of the result of its strike ballot, and secondly that its strike notice did not give [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 8:11 am
From Amor v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:01 am
Co. v Butts to apply to public figures who were not public officials. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 3:07 pm
(Jeff Mitchell/Files/REUTERS) Tammy Wynette’s widower’s widow is a limited purpose public figure when it comes to discussions of what used to be Wynette’s property, a split Texas appellate panel held Wednesday (McManus v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 6:18 am
A public defender who had sued the ACLU for an allegedly defamatory blog post is a public figure under the New York Times v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:25 am
In the case, titled Jason Yerk v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 7:12 am
Schulman filed in USA v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:03 pm
” In Von Hannover v Germany (2005) 40 EHRR 1 the European Court of Human Rights exposed the flaw in the A v B approach: 63. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 11:58 am
National Football Post is not the place one looks in the hopes of finding a reference to Hadley v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am
But whatever the law means, we can probably assume that the trade mark RED BULL, and the same trade mark owner's figurative trade marks (what normal people would call logos) or at least some of them, have reputations. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:14 am
LESLIE SMITH V. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 10:36 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 6:53 am
Figured readers would be interested in this look by Brian Mittendorf at the implications for Donor Advised Funds of Fairbairn v. [read post]
