Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 61 - 80 of 11,999
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2021, 7:04 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The district court awarded the plaintiff $350,000 for emotional distress and $700,000 in punitive damages, plus $24,000 in lost wages.The case is Villalta v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 12:31 am by JR Chaves
Obvia es la máxima trascendencia que la acreditación de esto último tiene para la válida constitución de la relación jurídico-procesal, pues siendo rogada la justicia en el ámbito del orden de jurisdicción contencioso-administrativo lo primero que ha de comprobarse es que la persona jurídica interesada ha solicitado realmente la tutela judicial, lo que a su vez precisa que tome el correspondiente acuerdo dirigido a tal… [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 11:08 am by Giles Peaker
That tells us nothing about what happens when the figures for the year are in, and the actual service charge can be calculated and compared to the estimate. [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 6:39 am by INFORRM
Butts, the “actual malice” requirement was extended to apply to “public figures” outside government, and then in 1974 case Gertz v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 3:50 pm by freedom0512
Department of Health and Human Services, of which the FDA is a part (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 10:58 am by Eric Goldman
Nevertheless, there seems to be a lack of appreciation of problems that may attend the interpretation of emoji, such as we have recently (and commendably) seen in an Australian case, Burrows v Houda, [2020] NSWDC 485. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 2:40 am by Donald Dinnie
That figure will be taken into account by the trial court in determining the reward to be paid to the funder. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 5:00 am by Neil H. Buchanan
” On the other side of that coin, people feel quite comfortable saying terrible things if they are not worried about being judged harshly.One particularly awful example of this phenomenon is the Supreme Court’s infamous 1986 Bowers v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
 By Eric SegallIn 2007, Professor Jack Balkin of Yale Law School shocked the academic world by arguing that Roe v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 4:52 pm
  So relatively slim pickings.Still, I thought that today's (sole) opinion helped prove the point that you can sometimes figure out the way a case will come out merely by seeing the manner in which the opinion frames the facts.For example, here, the first paragraph of the opinion seemed fairly pro-plaintiff, or at least not anti-her. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 2:51 pm by Angie Gou
“Luckily I did not have to sit there on my own and try to figure it out. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 7:37 am by Steve Lubet
As Justice Kavanaugh explained in his powerful concurring opinion in NCAA v. [read post]