Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 101 - 120 of 15,396
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2007, 8:06 am
In an earlier blog post on a pending case in the Sixth Circuit, Warshak v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 7:54 am
  Apparently it was easier for the Justices to figure out global warming than to figure out criminal history doctrines. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:39 am
L'Oréal SA and others v Bellure NV and others (Case C-487/07); [2009] WLR (D) 203 “The claimants, producers and marketers of luxury perfumes, were the proprietors in the United Kingdom of well-known trade marks, some in the form of word marks alone, and others being word and figurative marks including a representation of the bottle or [...] [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 2:22 pm
Homeless figures are out for the last quarter of 2007. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 8:06 am
While the Supreme Court debates obviousness in KSR v. [read post]
7 Aug 2021, 6:49 am by INFORRM
In the case of Reilly v Iconic Newspaper [2021] IEHC 490, a consultant engineer with the same name as a man who was banned from driving by an Irish court faces having to pay a costs bill running into six figures after failing in a bid to sue a newspaper over its report of the case. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 5:57 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The judge denied the defendant’s application for a separate property credit, and order the defendant to pay 2/3 of a HELOC, imputed the defendant’s income at $90K when figuring child support, failed to award spousal maintenance, and ordered the defendant to pay college costs. [read post]
15 May 2015, 11:16 am
 With no dissent.Doesn't take a genius to figure out which way that one comes out. [read post]
1 May 2023, 1:57 pm
It's fascinating that, in 2023, to figure out who gets to take some salmon from a given river in Washington, we have to try to figure out as best we can the particular places that a very tiny group of Native American with no written history occasionally went to go fishing back in the early 1800s.Or, more accurately, what a particular federal judge thought a half-century ago about the report of a particular anthropologist (Dr. [read post]