Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 121 - 140
of 13,749
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2011, 7:01 am
Laura Cooper (Minnesota) sent me word of this, and I'll admit that it took me awhile to figure out what was going on. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 2:27 pm
Since Biro was deemed to be a limited purpose public figure, the court dismissed the claims against him because he did not allege sufficient facts to plausibly […] [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 11:51 am
Firestone, that added another wrinkle to "public figure" under the line of cases following New York Times v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 3:54 pm
The Bristol paper reported here that Chief Judge Jones is trying to figure out the Supreme Court's decision in U.S. v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 1:29 am
The plaintiff in Grace v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:14 pm
As this year marks the 50th anniversary of the American Civil Rights Act of 1964, I figured I would pay tribute to this case and further promote awareness of it. [read post]
7 May 2008, 9:18 am
Best of all those six figures come with a considerably lower time commitment. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
Specifically, under the PCT this is a formal deficiency under Article 14(1)(a)(v) in combination with Rule 11.13(a), which can be remedied upon invitation under Article 14(1)(b). [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:43 am
Real property — Plugged drain pipe — Relevance of testimony Appellant (Plaintiff below), Michael Scott, challenges essentially the testimony of Appellee (Defendant below), Glenn Ives, who testified during the defense case-in-chief regarding his on-the-eve of trial discovery of an obstruction to a poly-vinyl chloride (PVC) drain pipe on Ives’s property that figured to some degree ... [read post]
3 Jun 2017, 1:13 pm
To see how this rule can play out to the detriment of a landowner, consider the recent case of Ocoee Utility District of Bradley and Polk Counties v. [read post]
3 Jun 2017, 1:13 pm
To see how this rule can play out to the detriment of a landowner, consider the recent case of Ocoee Utility District of Bradley and Polk Counties v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 11:38 am
Another decision in 1967, Curtis Publishing Company v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 11:55 am
The company's site once drew a steady 1,500 unique users monthly, Utube said, but that figure has soared to some 2 million per month in recent weeks. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 8:21 am
NAVIN V. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 1:32 pm
Think how tough it must be for unitary corporations with subsidiaries in California to figure out their respective state tax liability for forward and derivative contracts. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 6:01 pm
I guess I could have figured it out by reasoning from first principles. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 2:14 am
However, Roche argued that the technical effect was clearly shown in Figure 1. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:00 am
WFAA-TV, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 3:54 pm
In his attempt to have the defamation lawsuit dismissed, Musk tried to claim that, because of his involvement in the very public rescue of the group of boys, Unsworth should be classified as a public figure, but Judge Stephen V. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 2:18 am
A particularly good example of this is Jonathan Ive v. [read post]