Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 161 - 180
of 15,559
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2024, 7:08 am
Background adidas owns the German figurative trade mark no. 39912356 for the following sign: It has been registered in 1999 inter alia for “trousers, in particular sports and leisure trousers including shorts”. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Ogden to Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 10:03 am
It’s based on Yamaha Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 2:37 am
These features are shown in Figure 3 of the patent, set out above.The CFI ordered VusionGroup to pay the costs of the proceedings and other costs of Hanshow (including costs it had incurred by filing a protective letter), up to a maximum of EUR 200,000. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 10:17 am
Maslova v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 5:53 am
The Court applies the famous ruling in Tinker v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 5:31 am
Haaland v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 4:55 am
In Biden v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 3:56 am
Initiative v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 7:23 am
Raimondo and Ohio v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization Symposium on Alison L. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:27 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 4:08 am
NIKE, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
Here is the decision: Jankowicz v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 9:00 pm
As the Supreme Court made clear in Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:56 am
On appeal, the General Court (“GC”), in line with both lower instances, confirmed the descriptiveness of “Sophienwald” as a geographical indication (Ruling of 3 July 2024, T-597/22 – Sophienwald v EUIPO – Zalto Glas [Sw Sophienwald]). [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:56 am
On appeal, the General Court (“GC”), in line with both lower instances, confirmed the descriptiveness of “Sophienwald” as a geographical indication (Ruling of 3 July 2024, T-597/22 – Sophienwald v EUIPO – Zalto Glas [Sw Sophienwald]). [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 12:07 am
According to the CD Munich, the skilled person does not see Figure 26 as the (sole) definition of the catalytic domain in P4 or the Patent, see reason 7.11: Rather Figure 26, whilst keeping consistent with the understanding of the pro-, catalytic and V-domains as follows from P3, shows a sequence comparison of the PCSK9 amino acid sequence (“PCSK9parent”) and residues that were mutated in certain PCSK9 variants (“PCSK9mutants”). [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
A recent case, Ohio v. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
I might think the Constitution should reach more of national life than another person; I think the Court was wrong, for instance, to overrule Roe v. [read post]