Search for: "Fink v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2012, 9:32 am by Kurt T. Koehler
Fink, 45 Mich. 241 (1881).The state would probably challenge the contention that a rejection by referendum is a repeal as it is an act of the people rather than an act of the legislature.  [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
See International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 68 Welfare Fund v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 3:12 pm
State Bar, 52 Cal. 2d 310, 320 (1959); Brockway v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
Fink 14-281Issue: Whether a state's reduction of medical benefits to some categories of legal aliens but not others, conducted within the discretion afforded to the states by Congress under the cooperative Medicaid program, is subject only to rational-basis review when it is challenged as a denial of equal protection. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 3:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Under 22 NYCRR 202.27, a court may dismiss an action when a plaintiff is unprepared to proceed to trial at the call of the calendar (see Fink v Antell, 19 AD3d 215; Johnson v Brooklyn Hosp. [read post]
20 May 2016, 1:15 pm by Eugene Volokh
I’m delighted to report that the Michigan Court of Appeals has just upheld a Twitter parodist’s First Amendment claim in the “badass lawyer” case, Levitt v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:24 am
Kaplan on Monday prevented attorneys Robert Fink and Caroline Rule from withdrawing as defense counsel to former KPMG partner Richard Smith in United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
There’s a great quote from the 5th Circuit’s 1981 decision in Huddleston v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Aronson, Mayesfsky & Sloan, LLP, 168 AD3d 70, 75-76 [1st Dept 2018]; Harvey v Greenberg, 82 AD3d 683, 683 [1st Dept 2011]; Katebi v Fink, 51 AD3d 424, 425 [1st Dept 2008]). [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm by Russell Beck
Nevada: The United States District Court for the District of Nevada held in Switch Communications Group v. [read post]