Search for: "Finkelstein v Finkelstein"
Results 21 - 40
of 130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2009, 1:45 pm
All dialogue is actual and taken from the transcript on the Broward Blog in State v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 8:02 am
There is no dispute that Antilla included certain facts tending to support the short sellers’ story: Howard Finkelstein was a convicted felon who had, in fact, used the alias “Robert Howard,” see United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 6:04 am
Two US Courts Permit Defendants To Be Served on FacebookBring your gun, get a discount: Louisiana restaurant’s promotion sparks criticismKnow the LSUC Rules of Professional Conduct: changes are comingCRTC to Netflix: Since you won't co-operate, we'll ignore you Sun Media apologizes to Justin Trudeau California enacts strict student privacy law Ruth Bader Ginsburg: If Roe v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Rosenwald v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 6:40 am
The first entry in that debate, Professor Claire Finkelstein arguing in the affirmative, has been posted. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 8:19 am
v=g44TIJdBrGU [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 2:07 pm
In Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Allergy Pathway Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 74 Justice Finkelstein of the Federal Court fined Allergy Pathway Pty Ltd (formerly known as Advanced Allergy Elimination) and its director, Mr Paul Keir, $7,500 each for contempt of undertakings made to the court following a successful 2009 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission action for false, misleading and deceptive conduct. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 10:16 am
In Doviak v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 8:57 am
In 2018, a case was brought in front of the First Department Appellate Division in New York Finkelstein v Finkelstein, 162 A.D.3d 401, 79 N.Y.S.3d 17, 2018 N.Y. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 9:28 am
An estate's interest in a rental apartment was presented recently in Renaissance Equity Holdings LLC v. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 2:02 pm
In Financial Industry Complaints Service Ltd v Deakin Financial Services Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 1805 (21 December 2006) Deakin challenged FICS' jurisdiction to resolve disputes by clients of Deakin. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 8:53 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 5:57 am
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter:Harper government names a slew of new federal judges, but none for Ontario despite 31 vacanciesThe evolution of fraudulent conveyance – Indcondo v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:18 pm
UPDATE: It is worth setting out the factors that Justice Finkelstein placed the most reliance on. [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:55 pm
The Federal Court (Finkelstein J dissenting) declared that section 657A(2)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 is invalid. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 7:04 pm
Here is the link to the 1999 11th Circuit Opinion detailing more of former Broward prosecutor Robert Carney's malfeasance;And here is a pertinent part of the decision copied from the Broward Blog: :Purvis v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 3:13 pm
Finkelstein Judging Without the Facts: A Schematic for Reviewing State Secrets Privilege Claims Michael H. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 2:47 am
" However, the documentary evidence demonstrated that the plaintiff's individual liability on the notes was a matter outside of the scope of the defendants' representation of the plaintiff in her capacity as co-executor of the estate (see CPLR 3211[a][1]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435; DeNatale v Santangelo, 65 AD3d 1006, 1007; Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850). [*2]" [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:10 am
" However, the documentary evidence demonstrated that the plaintiff's individual liability on the notes was a matter outside of the scope of the defendants' representation of the plaintiff in her capacity as co-executor of the estate (see CPLR 3211[a][1]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435; DeNatale v Santangelo, 65 AD3d 1006, 1007; Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850). [*2]" [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 2:57 am
" However, the documentary evidence demonstrated that the plaintiff's individual liability on the notes was a matter outside of the scope of the defendants' representation of the plaintiff in her capacity as co-executor of the estate (see CPLR 3211[a][1]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435; DeNatale v Santangelo, 65 AD3d 1006, 1007; Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850). [*2]" [read post]
