Search for: "Finnegan v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2018, 8:46 pm by Patent Docs
IAM North America editor Richard Lloyd will moderate a roundtable discussion of attorneys from Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt; Knobbe Martens; and Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner to discuss the implications of the Supreme Court's decision in decisions in Oil States v Greene's Energy and SAS Institute v Iancu and how they will affect the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), inter partes review petitioners, and patent owners. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 9:17 pm by Patent Docs
Speakers include: Donald Verrilli, Munger, Tolles & Olson; Erika Arner, Finnegan, Henderson; Paul Berghoff, McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff; John Duffy, University of Virginia Law School; The Hon. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:56 am by Olivia Cross
The Transgenic Mice of Regeneron By Stoyan Radkov and Daniel Finnegan  Radkov is Of Counsel, and Finnegan is the lead Patent Attorney with Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 10:00 pm
Eric Fues at Finnegan Henderson recently wrote a great article (originally published in Patent World in June 07) about the utility of USITC proceedings in light of the US Supreme Court's May 2006 decision in eBay v MercExchange (which, if you have not been following US patent law, made it harder to obtain injunctions in patent cases).The USITC (United States International Trade Commission) is the US border protection agency, or, in the words of the USITC: An… [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 4:35 am by TJ McIntyre
The deferential standard is that applied by Keane C.J. in Orange v The Director of Telecommunications Regulation & Anor and not that in The State (Keegan) v Stardust Compensation Tribunal. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 2:01 pm by Joe Patrice
In honor of Shark Week, the article should have spent a lot more time on the United States v. [read post]