Search for: "Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch" Results 21 - 36 of 36
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2013, 1:15 pm by Mary E. Hodges
  When announcing this standard of review, the Supreme Court in Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:38 pm by Kiera Flynn
HansenDocket: 11-57Issue(s): (1) Whether someone who would have rights or claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) “but for” the wrongful acts of that person’s former employer has standing to sue on those claims in federal court; (2) whether Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:28 pm by Robert J. McKennon
The federal courts have for a long time struggled with how to apply the deferential standard of review to actions taken by ERISA plan administrators in light of the United States Supreme Court holding in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:16 pm
To answer the first question, the Court relied on its decision in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:15 am
Glenn"A benefits plan administrator's dual role of both evaluating and paying benefits claims creates the kind of conflict of interest for which judicial review is appropriate under Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 1:26 pm
And trust law, to which ERISA is so intimately linked, Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]