Search for: "FirstMerit Bank, N.A"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2016, 9:09 am
”) FirstMerit Bank, N.A. v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 9:50 am
In re FirstMerit Bank, N.A., 52 S.W.3d 749, 756 (Tex. 2001). [read post]
2 May 2017, 7:52 am
” In re FirstMerit Bank, N.A., 52 S.W.3d at 755. [read post]
10 May 2010, 7:58 pm
In re FirstMerit Bank, N.A., 52 S.W.3d 749, 756 (Tex. 2001). [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 6:03 pm
In re FirstMerit Bank, N.A., 52 S.W.3d 749, 754 (Tex. 2001) (orig. proceeding). [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 2:03 pm
In re Bank One, N.A., 216 S.W.3d 825, 826 (Tex. 2007) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam).[3] To be entitled to the extraordinary relief of a writ of mandamus, the relator must show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and it has no adequate remedy by appeal. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:08 pm
In re FirstMerit Bank, N.A., 52 S.W.3d 749, 758 (Tex. 2001). [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
In GT Leach Builders LLC v Sapphire VP, LP, No. 13-0497 (Tex. 2015), a complex commercial dispute involving multiple parties and multiple contracts, the Texas Supreme Court recently addressed a number of important arbitration-related issues. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:57 pm
., 257 S.W.3d 228, 233 (Tex. 2008), citing In re FirstMerit Bank, N.A., 52 S.W.3d 749, 757 (Tex. 2001). [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:13 pm
In Re Service Corporation International (SCI) (Tex. 2011) PER CURIAM OPINION OF THE TEXAS SUPREME COURT This mandamus proceeding arises from an arbitration agreement governed by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:42 pm
” In re FirstMerit Bank, N.A., 52 S.W.3d 749, 753–54 (Tex. 2001). [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:13 pm
In Re Service Corporation International (SCI) (Tex. 2011) PER CURIAM OPINION OF THE TEXAS SUPREME COURT This mandamus proceeding arises from an arbitration agreement governed by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:57 pm
., 257 S.W.3d 228, 233 (Tex. 2008), citing In re FirstMerit Bank, N.A., 52 S.W.3d 749, 757 (Tex. 2001). [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
CREDIT ACCESS BUSINESS MODEL TEXAS-STYLE: CRIMINAL BAD-CHECK PROSECUTION FOR THEE, ARBITRATION FOR ME Texas Supreme Court parted ways with Fifth Circuit in concluding in customers' action against payday lender that payday lender had not waived right to enforce arbitration agreement by utilizing the criminal justice system in aid of debt collection after deliberately depositing borrowers' post-dated checks that they knew would bounce after borrower's default on… [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Take Payday Lenders and Arbitration as a Textbook Case: What is the Majority Position on Litigation Waiver and Who Got It Right? [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
Texas has an Access to Justice Commission; but don’t be fooled. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
May a payday lender enforce arbitration clause after wrongfully filing bad-check affidavits and procuring criminal prosecution of borrowers in aid of collecting civil debt when debtors turn the tables on them and sue? [read post]
