Search for: "Firth, Appeal of" Results 1 - 20 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2013, 8:15 am
”The Peel Law Association is “disappointed” with the appeal court’s decision, says Mark Freiman, the lawyer representing Firth and the association. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 1:03 am
As characterized by the Court of Appeals, the central issue in Firth's appeal concerned how "defamation jurisprudence, developed in New York courts in connection with traditional, i.e., printed, mass media communications, applies to communications in a new medium -- cyberspace -- in the modern Information Age" insofar as the statute of limitations for bringing such a law suit is concerned. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 7:20 am
The lounge is only open to lawyers, and Firth routinely asked lounge members for identification. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 2:09 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 183 (12 March 2008) Furniss v Firth Brown Tools Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 182 (12 March 2008) Emmott v Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 184 (12 March 2008) Kelly & Ors R. [read post]
6 Jan 2007, 8:13 pm
The appeal followed action by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
***The Office of the State Inspector General distributed a report entitled The Best Bang for Their Buck, in which Firth's management style was criticized at a press conference. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 8:36 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Ibrahim & Ors, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 880 (23 April 2008) Clarke v R [2008] EWCA Crim 651 (23 April 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Campaign To End All Animal Experiments (t/a The British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 417 (23 April 2008) Green Lane Products Ltd v PMS International Group Plc & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 358 (23 April… [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:10 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Guardian News and Media Ltd, R (on the application of) v City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court [2012] EWCA Civ 420 (03 April 2012) Faniyan v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2012] EWCA Civ 411 (03 April 2012) Central Bank of Nigeria v Williams [2012] EWCA Civ 415 (03 April 2012) CB & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 418 (03 April 2012) Council of the City of Sunderland v Brennan & Ors [2012]… [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 5:54 am by Nycole A. Thompson
Government of the Virgin Islands, the Third Circuit agreed with the Second, Firth, Ninth, and D.C. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Judge Smith said that “the privilege of absolute immunity is bestowed upon an official who is ‘a principal executive of State or local government or is entrusted by law with administrative or executive policy-making responsibilities of considerable dimension,'" and that this privilege “extends to those of subordinate rank who exercise delegated powers,” citing Firth v State of New York, 12 AD3d 907, lv to appeal denied, 4 NY3d 709 and Ward Telecom.… [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 2:52 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty To Animals v Sharp & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1474 (21 December 2010) Quila & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1482 (21 December 2010) Francis, R (on the application of) v West Midlands Probation Board [2010] EWCA Civ 1470 (21 December 2010) Safeway Stores Ltd & Ors v Twigger & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1472 (21 December 2010) The Scout Association v Barnes [2010] EWCA Civ 1476 (21… [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:16 am by NCC Staff
Supreme Court upheld a stay from the federal appeals court, allowing the law to remain in effect until the Fifth Circuit could rule on the case. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 10:42 am by Ben Rubin
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit found that although the MBTA imposes a strict liability standard for any of the aforementioned acts, in order for an unlawful “taking” to occur the defendant must have taken a “deliberate act done directly and intentionally to migratory birds. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 11:09 pm by Tessa Shepperson
In any case it is believed that this case is going to be appealed to the Supreme Court so this may change. [read post]