Search for: "Firth v. State of NY"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2015, 4:25 pm
By contrast, in the United States (see Firth v New York, 747 NYS 2d 69 (2002)) and in England (see the notes to section 8 of the Defamation Act 2013), the single-publication rule means a cause of action accrues only when the material is first accessed. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
& Computer Services v State of New York, 42 NY2d 289. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 1:03 am
Allegations of defamation of the employee follow postings made on the employer's web site Firth v State of New York, NYS Court of Appeals, 98 NY2d 365 From time to time, an employee will sue his or her public employer contending that he or she was defamed because of the employer's dissemination of information concerning his or her performance of official duties that the individual considers demeaning or embarrassing. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 5:59 pm
Finally, the court also dismisses any claim for the 2006 post based on the statute of limitations plus the single publication rule as articulated in Firth v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 6:08 am
Hudson, NY museum of fire fighting. [read post]
