Search for: "Fischer v Fischer" Results 1 - 20 of 971
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2024, 8:22 pm by Solomon L. Wisenberg
Supreme Court recently granted the Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed in Fischer v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 4:47 am by sally
Folien Fischer AG and another v Ritrama SpA (Case C-133/11); [2012] WLR (D) 292 “An action for a negative declaration seeking to establish the absence of liability in tort, delict, or quasi-delict fell within the scope of article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L12, p 1).” WLR Daily, 25th October 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
12 May 2016, 9:18 pm
Kolja Möller, A critical theory of transnational regimes: creeping managerialism and the quest for a destituent power Christoph Menke, Materialism of form: on the self-reflection of law Sonja Buckel, The dialectic of democracy and capitalism before the backdrop of a transnational legal pluralism in crisis Andreas Fischer-Lescano, Putting proportionality in proportion: whistleblowing in transnational law Hannah Franzki & Johan Horst, On the critical potential of law –… [read post]
30 May 2013, 8:18 am
Fischer has published Militär- und Sicherheitsunternehmen in bewaffneten Konflikten und Friedenssicherungsoperationen (Duncker & Humblot 2013). [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 11:24 am by Michael O'Hear
I see that On Point has posted the latest decision in the Fischer v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 8:37 am
Anna Fischer has published Sezession im Völkerrecht – Faktisches Phänomen oder reale Utopie: Die Geschichte eines Prinzips im Lichte eines unglücklichen Präzedenzfalls (Peter Lang 2017). [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 9:00 am
Paula Fischer has published Das Irrtumsrisiko bei den Ausnahmen des völkerrechtlichen Gewaltverbotes (Nomos 2020). [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 6:32 am
Filed May 21, 2009.Opinion by Judge Mary Beth McCormick.Held: Unnamed co-owner of a business was entitled to one half of the net proceeds from the sale of the business, despite the lack of agreement or "paper trail" evidencing ownership, because an implied-in-fact contract existed between the co-owners. [read post]