Search for: "Fisher v. District Court"
Results 201 - 220
of 831
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2017, 2:20 pm
The answers to the certified questions issued by the majority opinion are as follows: Question 1: As a matter of Iowa law, does the doctrine of implied immunity of drainage districts as applied in cases such as Fisher v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 2:20 pm
The majority answered the certified questions as follows: Question 1: As a matter of Iowa law, does the doctrine of implied immunity of drainage districts as applied in cases such as Fisher v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
On Tuesday, the court heard oral argument in Lynch v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 5:30 am
In OOO Brunswick Rail Mgmt. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 4:25 am
Today the court will hear oral argument in Endrew F. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Farm Bureau Fed'n v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Farm Bureau Fed'n v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 3:31 am
Texas] “Justices Struggle With Cheerleader Uniform Case That Holds Big Implications For Fashion” [Daniel Fisher on Star Athletica v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 1:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 2:53 am
This morning the court will hear oral argument in Lynch v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 8:50 am
The litigation was initially filed by franchise law attorneys in Hamilton County Superior Court under Cause No. 29D03-1609-PL-008343 on behalf of Plaintiffs Britt Interactive, LLC and TownePost Network, Inc. of Fishers, Indiana. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am
” Yesterday, the court also heard argument in Star Athletica v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 12:49 pm
” The court then certified four questions to the Iowa Supreme Court: Question 1: As a matter of Iowa law, does the doctrine of implied immunity of drainage districts as applied in cases such as Fisher v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 11:07 am
After years of going back and forth to the Supreme Court over litigation in Fisher v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:53 am
The Inclusive Communities Project and the second Fisher v. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 1:15 pm
LEXIS 100928 (WD TN, Aug. 2, 2016), a Tennessee federal district court allowed a Muslim inmate to move ahead on his complaint that he was refused a protein supplement when pork was served and was not allowed to eat within the proper time during Ramadan.In Fisher v. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 9:49 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:02 pm
Eye 4 Group, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 2:42 pm
On June 23, 2016, the Supreme Court decided Fisher v. [read post]
