Search for: "Fisher v. District Court" Results 201 - 220 of 919
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2017, 7:27 am
This post examines a recent decision from the Court of Appeal – First District, California: In re Carlos H., 2017 WL 695953 (2017). [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:41 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Turner v. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 11:10 am by Schachtman
For instance, in the Zoloft multi-district birth defects litigation, plaintiffs argued in a motion for reconsideration of the exclusion of their epidemiologic witness that the trial court had failed to give appropriate weight to the Supreme Court’s decision in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 7:37 am by Joy Waltemath
Relying on the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 8:51 pm by John A. Gallagher
As reported by Dan Fisher in Forbes (Supreme  Court asks government if a Coke machine must be ADA compliant), on February 27 the Supreme Court docketed a request to the Solicitor General for input on Magee’s pending Petition for Certiorari.Justice Antonin ScaliaJustice Scalia’s Dissent in PGA Tour v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
EEOC, in which the justices will decide what standard of review courts of appeals should use when reviewing district courts’ decisions to quash or enforce EEOC subpoenas; and Kindred Nursing Centers Limited Partnership v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 8:22 am by Richard Hunt
I blogged last year about the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Magee v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:22 am by Heidi A. Nadel
A Superior Court judge denied the anti-SLAPP motions, citing the SJC's earlier decisions inKobrin v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 6:41 am by Joy Waltemath
” To hold otherwise, said the Fifth Circuit, which reversed summary judgment against the machinist, could “incentivize supervisors motivated by retaliatory animus to initiate groundless investigations with the purpose of causing the targeted employees to resist them” (Fisher v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:16 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri: Ross v. [read post]
The majority answered the certified questions as follows: Question 1: As a matter of Iowa law, does the doctrine of implied immunity  of  drainage  districts  as  applied  in  cases  such  as  Fisher  v. [read post]
The answers to the certified questions issued by the majority opinion are as follows: Question 1: As a matter of Iowa law, does the doctrine of implied immunity  of  drainage  districts  as  applied  in  cases  such  as  Fisher  v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 11:54 am by Estelle J. Tsevdos, Ph.D.
An interesting event has occurred at the Supreme Court in the Life Technologies Corp (Life Tech) v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 12:00 am by Estelle J. Tsevdos
An interesting event has occurred at the Supreme Court in the Life Technologies Corp (Life Tech) v. [read post]