Search for: "Fisher v. District Court"
Results 221 - 240
of 901
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court ruled 4-3 in Fisher v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 11:43 am
The vote in Fisher v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 11:37 am
Fisher v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:58 pm
In Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 2:23 pm
Prosecutors believed that Doe was lying, and they asked the district court to review Doe’s refusal to comply with the order. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:05 am
Wade, a skeptic of affirmative action (dissenting in Fisher v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:53 pm
Coursey, No. 14-35897 (5-24-16)(Watford with Fisher and Berzon). [read post]
13 May 2016, 1:56 pm
Cieszyski v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 6:07 pm
A similar suit has been filed in federal district court in North Carolina (Students for Fair Admissions, Inc v University of North Carolina, MDNC, dkt no 14-954). [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:03 pm
The court noted that Dr. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 7:48 am
Fisher, 2016 U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 3:42 pm
The district court agreed. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:13 am
” An online symposium at the University of Miami Law Review anticipates the decision in Fisher v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:48 am
In Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Tony Mauro focuses on the Court’s grant of review in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
But last week the Ninth Circuit decided a case that shows how tricky government consideration of race can be, and how lower court judges sometimes make missteps in this complex area.The case is Mitchell v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:55 am
Briefly: At Forbes, Daniel Fisher urges the Court to grant review in the antitrust case FTC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 12:56 pm
Frost v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
” In other news, on Wednesday the Court will hear oral arguments in Zubik v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 6:44 am
Over defense objection the district court held that the riot statute was overinclusive, but divisible. [read post]
