Search for: "Fisher v. District Court" Results 261 - 280 of 831
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2020, 6:16 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Mystic Transportation, 202 F.3d 129 (2d Cir. 2000), for this proposition, seemingly setting aside (for the moment) the pretext-plus formulation that sometimes informs these cases, as per the Court's en banc ruling in Fisher v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 7:51 am by Charlotte Garden
An observer who had nothing to go on except the back-and-forth in Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 7:02 pm by Mike
District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 11:40 pm
Plaintiff had claimed that he should be allowed to grow his hair for religious reasons despite prison grooming requirements.In Fisher v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 3:43 am
This posting covers the sole patent case that was appealed from the district court level and decided by the Federal Circuit during the 19th calendar week of 2007. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:36 pm by Scott McKeown
(Internal citations omitted) A few weeks earlier, in Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 8:11 am by Dan Bressler
” “The cruise line’s argument is that the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, which encompass district courts for the Southern District of Florida, requires that Dunlavy be disqualified from representing Chen. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 1:04 pm by John Elwood
After his conviction became final, Richter’s federal habeas petition was rejected by the district court and a unanimous panel of the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:06 am by Kali Borkoski
  The Court did not act on the affirmative action case, Fisher v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:23 am
"All this is compliant with the GAT and Folien decisions and the Corte di Cassazione ruling, as well the UK decision in Joined cases Actavis Group hf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) and Medis ehf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) [here]. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 5:09 am by SHG
Think, perhaps, of the case of Obergefell v. [read post]