Search for: "Fisher v. District Court"
Results 281 - 300
of 831
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2015, 11:36 pm
An application by the defendants in Mallegowda v Amit Sood & Anor for $500,000-$600,000 security for costs, was rejected by Judge Gibson in the NSW District Court. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 10:56 am
Nelson v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 3:07 pm
The district court hadn't addressed prejudice, however, and so the court remanded the case to let the district court consider that aspect of the collateral attack on the underlying removal order, see 8 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 7:13 am
It is from the Western District, Austin Division. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 5:50 am
With the will, and ability, to fight, District Court Judge Larry Hicks ripped the government for the level upon level of lies used to get, and then try to salvage, the seizure. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Meanwhile, the closely watched Fisher v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
To those who have been under a rock, Fisher v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:28 am
But that was before the Supreme Court decided Walker v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
Mack, 14-990, which asks whether, under the statute that provides for three-judge district courts for constitutional challenges to the apportionment of congressional districts or statewide legislative bodies (28 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:59 pm
Fisher v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 2:55 am
Their petition to the Supreme Court in Sac and Fox Nation v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Delphine Fisher, where the defendant was charged with murder in the first degree, and accused of killing her husband, Harry Fisher, by setting fire to the house where he was sleeping. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
Remember the three-judge district court we mentioned above? [read post]
28 May 2015, 10:45 am
Fisher v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
Holder and who represent the challenger in Fisher v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am
Fisher v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am
Mark Walsh covered the Court’s denial of certiorari in a special-education “stay put” case, Ridley School District v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 10:42 pm
The district court found that these animals included but were not necessarily limited to wolves, cougars, bobcats, otters, beavers, lynx, fishers, martens, and badgers. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
The respondent, however, declined the offer; and the district court refused to declare that the offer had mooted the respondent’s claims. [read post]
