Search for: "Fisher v. District Court"
Results 281 - 300
of 913
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2015, 3:58 am
At Balkinization, David Gans discusses the amicus brief that the Constitutional Accountability Center filed in Fisher v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 1:40 pm
The 9th affirmed that the district court's finding that the prosecutor's motivation in striking an African-American was substantially racial. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 8:41 am
Messer, Angela Messer, Debtors Daren Messer & Angela Messer v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 9:22 am
Manning — federal court authority to decide a securities case filed initially in state court Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
In Fisher v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 11:04 am
McMonagle v. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 10:43 am
Held:“Following the convictions, this court decided United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
The doctrine, introduced in Fisher v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 8:03 am
Abigail Fisher, after all, doesn’t ask the Court to overturn its endorsement, in Grutter v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 6:54 am
” At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Joshua Thompson discusses the amicus brief that PLF filed in Fisher v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 7:31 am
" The district court and the 3d Circuit granted habeas relief, relying on the combined holdings of Bruton, Richardson v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 8:41 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 8:36 am
District court’s opinion seems to rub Frank the wrong way—complains about heavy workload and says he won’t analyze Arnstein’s remaining arguments. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
” The case is City of Inglewood v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 11:29 am
In this case, the district court failed to determine whether the offense of attempt or possession of a firearm was a COV. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Blum first tried to get the Supreme Court interested in this issue in the 2001 case of Chen v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 11:36 pm
An application by the defendants in Mallegowda v Amit Sood & Anor for $500,000-$600,000 security for costs, was rejected by Judge Gibson in the NSW District Court. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 10:56 am
Nelson v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 3:07 pm
The district court hadn't addressed prejudice, however, and so the court remanded the case to let the district court consider that aspect of the collateral attack on the underlying removal order, see 8 U.S.C. [read post]
