Search for: "Fisher v. District Court" Results 341 - 360 of 912
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2008, 10:34 am
The 9th (Beezer joined by Fisher and Timlin) vacate a sentence and remand for resentencing because the district court failed to give him notice of its intent to depart from the guidelines. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Two others stand out: race-based affirmative action, and state constitutional experimentation in the regulation of federal elections.On affirmative action, in Fisher v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:26 am by Jeffrey May
The October 7, 2011, decision of the federal district court in Philadelphia in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 10:26 am
Here's a good example.It's an ineffective assistance of counsel habeas case that gets dismissed by the district court and, back in April of 2008, is unanimously affirmed by the panel, which consists of Judges Beezer, Trott and Randy Smith.The case then gets taken en banc. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 8:03 am by Andrew Grossman and Ilya Shapiro
Abigail Fisher, after all, doesn’t ask the Court to overturn its endorsement, in Grutter v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 12:41 pm
Because of the release of the Court’s opinion in Baze v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 6:12 am
The district court was appalled at the police conduct, and suppressed. [read post]
15 May 2008, 3:14 pm
Section 3731 permits the United States to appeal an order of the district court that, inter alia, suppresses evidence in a criminal case upon the filing of a certification by the U.S. that the suppressed evidence is important and the appeal not taken for the purpose of delay. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:05 am
LEXIS 5157 (WD NY, Jan. 26, 2009),a New York federal district court rejected a prisoner's claim that the prison's Religious Alternative Meals did not adequately accommodate his Nation of Islam dietary requirements.In Ashanti v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 2:13 am
The 9th (Smith joined by Kleinfeld and Fisher) vacate and remand a sentencing because the court calculated the value of loss erroneously. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 8:22 am by Richard Hunt
I blogged last year about the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Magee v. [read post]