Search for: "Fisher v. District Court"
Results 361 - 380
of 833
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2013, 3:31 pm
“We also affirm the district court’s rejection of sentencing entrapment. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:06 pm
The closeness in timing of the June decision in Fisher v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:37 pm
The district court’s decision was not only legally right, but good policy. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 2:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances --Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:03 am
Fresh off their decision in the affirmative action case from last term, Fisher v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:55 am
Just a couple of months ago, in Fisher v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 2:21 pm
In Northwest Austin Municipal Utilities District No. 1 v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 12:31 pm
————- The Fifth Circuit Court, beginning a process of deciding how to react to the Supreme Court’s skeptical new view of the use of race in college admissions, on Thursday handed lawyers a list of questions to shape the next round in the case of Fisher v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:29 am
After having declined in Fisher v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 11:25 am
Mulkey (and indeed to the odd disposition of the Supreme Court in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 10:55 am
” United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 5:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:00 am
As the Court held in Fisher v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 7:05 am
Thomas Fisher, Kathleen Halloran, and George BehrensCase number: 07-cv-04483 (United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois)Case filed:August 9, 2007Qualifying Judgment/Order: May 29, 2013 6/19/2013 9/17/2013 More notices are listed in my previous post. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 2:28 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 2:28 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Jul. 2, 2013) (per curiam), the Ninth Circuit reversed another remand order after holding that the district court had jurisdiction under CAFA. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 10:52 am
Which the district court guys, dismissing the indictment on that basis.But the Ninth Circuit reverses. [read post]
