Search for: "Fisher v. District Court"
Results 381 - 400
of 831
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2010, 11:28 am
And the October War occurs, one result of which is to raise the price of oil from $1.50 a barrel to over $11.50 a barrel.Meanwhile, the Supreme Court decides not only Roe v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 5:50 am
Brandt Revocable Trust v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 1:26 pm
” IdFederal district courts must apply the choice of law rules of the state in which they sit when jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:01 pm
Fisher, appointed by the Court. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 5:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:53 pm
Coursey, No. 14-35897 (5-24-16)(Watford with Fisher and Berzon). [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:58 am
At Balkinization, David Gans discusses the amicus brief that the Constitutional Accountability Center filed in Fisher v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 9:07 am
On appeal, the 9th (O'Scannlain joined by Goodwin and Fisher) reasoned that it should be the court that had discretion. [read post]
1 May 2013, 9:54 am
The Texas case, Fisher v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:05 pm
Fisher, a Stanford law professor, with thirty minutes of time. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:45 am
When the Court issued yesterday’s decision in Fisher v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Yesterday afternoon, an eleven-judge en banc Ninth Circuit panel heard oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 3:01 pm
Fisher also pointed out how New York’s rule does not contain a requirement of improper behavior, which Giles v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 9:40 am
Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for the majority in Fisher v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
In part, the amici correctly identified the experimental milieu in which Fisher worked, but the description of Fisher’s work is neither accurate nor fair. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 11:03 am
The district court denies the petition, and back in 2011, a three-judge panel affirms. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 11:49 am
Lorenzo v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 5:01 pm
United States and United States v. [read post]
