Search for: "Fisher v. District Court"
Results 441 - 460
of 822
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2012, 6:33 am
It explains the case of Fisher v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:07 am
District Court in Washington to deny preclearance for Texas’s new election maps continues to draw coverage. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 8:16 am
Sinclair, No. 09-99021 (8-28-12) (Clifton with Fisher and Paez).In an appeal from a denial of a capital habeas, the 9th reverses the district court's finding that the IAC claim on failure to present mitigating evidence was procedurally defaulted. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:37 am
At Balkinization, Stephen Griffin provides a “skeptical take” on Fisher v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 4:50 am
The British Columbia Court of Appeal has struck down a downzoning bylaw to eliminate composting at a licenced composting business: Fisher Road Holdings Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:24 am
Smith; concurrence by Fisher with B. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am
To be sure, Bickel was more than willing to defend Brown v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:18 am
Coverage continues of the amicus briefs filed earlier this week in Fisher v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 4:06 am
By Dennis Crouch Magsil Corp. and MIT v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 9:41 am
The case has set the stage for the first big affirmative action battle since the Supreme Court's 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 11:29 am
On Monday, Constitutional Accountability Center filed an amici curiae brief in the Supreme Court in Fisher v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 12:46 pm
But in the high court's 2009 Arizona v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:30 am
Cal.; June 19, 2012), the Northern District found that the reasoning in U.S. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
As he observes, the opinion creates a split in authority with Fisher v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 11:11 am
Given that Caron diverges from Fisher v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:05 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York 10-00096. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 11:11 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
The recent SASCO v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:02 pm
In Olano, the Supreme Court made it clear that “the [plain] error must have been prejudicial: It must have affected the outcome of the district court proceedings. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm
Statements in Open Court and Apologies On 12 July 2012 there was a statement in open court in the privacy case of Contostavlos v Mendahun. [read post]
