Search for: "Fisher v. District Court" Results 461 - 480 of 826
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2012, 8:02 pm by Zachary Spilman
In Olano, the Supreme Court made it clear that “the [plain] error must have been prejudicial: It must have affected the outcome of the district court proceedings. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Statements in Open Court and Apologies On 12 July 2012 there was a statement in open court in the privacy case of Contostavlos v Mendahun. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am by familoo
[NB Minor corrections made above @ 10pm 25/06/12: OBE should have read CBE, letter went to Philip Waller not DJ Crichton] David Jockelson c/o Miles and Partners 88-90 Middlesex Street London E1 7EZ DX: 124407 CDE dj@milesandpartners.com  15 June 2012 Sir Nicholas Wall Mrs Justice Pauffley Mr Justice Ryder HHJ Altman Senior District Judge Waller  Via your DX addresses Dear Judges We are writing to you because of the news that Wells St is to close and the Inner and City London… [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
Supreme Court reconsideration of its holding, in San Antonio Independent School District v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:17 am by Steve Hall
District Court judge to require the state to increase witness access to its executions, starting with the upcoming execution of Richard A. [read post]
18 May 2012, 11:43 am by Marcia Coyle
” The Project on Fair Representation is also behind the affirmative action challenge that the Supreme Court has decided to hear next term: Fisher v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:28 am by David Gans
” This fight over Brown is sure to continue next Term, when the Justices consider Fisher v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 9:34 am by Jon Sands
 The district court dismissed petitioner's habeas as untimely. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:43 am by Lyle Denniston
  Padilla has asked the Supreme Court to review that ruling (Lebron, et al., v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:14 am by John Elwood
We therefore hold that Yoo must be granted qualified immunity, and accordingly reverse the decision of the district court. [read post]
2 May 2012, 8:42 am by Jon Sands
 Here, one defendant struck gold in that he did challenge within the time frame, and got his conviction reversed because the district court precluded him from challenging the Service's decision denying his plan of operations. [read post]