Search for: "Fisher v. District Court"
Results 501 - 520
of 833
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
In that case, the Minnesota District Court dismissed the employer's claim because it found that the employees had authorized access to the information they allegedly stole. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:26 pm
The district court grants summary judgment to the University of Oregon.The Ninth Circuit reverses.Judge Gould writes an opinion that -- reading between the lines -- hints that his own view is that there probably wasn't actionable discrimination, but nonetheless holds that the evidence from the student was sufficient to get to a jury. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 2:28 pm
Fisher v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:34 am
Mr Justice MostynIn Fisher Meredith LLP v JH & Anor [2012] EWHC 408 (Fam) Mr Justice Mostyn considered an appeal against a wasted costs order made against the wife's solicitors in financial remedy proceedings.The case involved a company in which the husband had been allocated shares, which he claimed he had only ever held as a nominee for his uncle "and/or" his uncle's brothers. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:45 am
The big news from SCOTUS this week was the acceptance of cert in Fisher v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:16 pm
(Ilya Somin) In general, I am not a fan of the “diversity” rationale for affirmative action, and I have considerable sympathy for plaintiffs’ position in Fisher v. [read post]
Fisher v. University of Texas, Justice Kennedy, and the Text and History of the Fourteenth Amendment
28 Feb 2012, 1:40 pm
Fisher is largely an attempt to seek a do-over of the Court’s 2003 opinion in Grutter v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
District Court. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 9:09 pm
Fisher, a law professor at Stanford. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 12:58 pm
See Fisher v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:54 am
The cert. grant in Fisher v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 3:45 pm
Ct. at 2044 (trying to compel production of documents); Fisher v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:59 am
The case is Fisher v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 10:49 am
” It was to say that the district court had granted a preliminary injunction, finding that, “subject to final determination of the merits of the parties' claims, statements that ‘the BOSS Power V-XT v-blade cannot trip in the V or scoop mode’ and certain statements claiming or implying that users of blade-trip plows will be physically injured but users of Fisher/ Western edge-trip plows will not were… [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 12:05 pm
Fisher v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 10:49 am
Indiana Copyright Litigation Update – Broadcast Music Inc. et al v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:26 am
Fisher v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:26 am
Fisher v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 8:41 pm
The district court shifted attorneys fees to the prevailing counterdefendant, after Best Medical lodged specious claims of trade secrets misappropriation. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm
Of course, Fisher v. [read post]
