Search for: "Fisher v. District Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 913
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2014, 3:25 pm
The Circuit Court, in another preliminary ruling, declined to send the case back to a district court judge to develop new facts about the admissions practices at the Austin campus. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Many facets of Wednesday’s oral argument in the Fisher v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 9:01 pm
., the Court is scheduled to hear argument in Kennedy v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 8:39 am
The district court agreed. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 2:33 pm
This Essay describes a series of grave defects in Fisher v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
Jackson Board of Education, and Hazelwood School District v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 3:15 am
Case v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 6:07 pm
A similar suit has been filed in federal district court in North Carolina (Students for Fair Admissions, Inc v University of North Carolina, MDNC, dkt no 14-954). [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 5:57 pm
Last month, in a somewhat surprising decision, U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a District Court ruling that employees of KBR could not sue their employer in tort. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
In the products liability case of McDaniel v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 11:07 am
After years of going back and forth to the Supreme Court over litigation in Fisher v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 8:29 am
We have no basis to disagree with the district court's conclusion. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 2:20 pm
The majority answered the certified questions as follows: Question 1: As a matter of Iowa law, does the doctrine of implied immunity of drainage districts as applied in cases such as Fisher v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 2:20 pm
The answers to the certified questions issued by the majority opinion are as follows: Question 1: As a matter of Iowa law, does the doctrine of implied immunity of drainage districts as applied in cases such as Fisher v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 5:00 am
In a recent Western District of Pennsylvania Federal Court decision of Homer v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 8:13 am
Fisher-Price, Inc. and Mattel, Inc. and Perfect 10 v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 2:45 am
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:41 am
I’ll note at the outset that of course this broadly remedial rationale for the legality of its discrimination is not being urged by the University of Texas (making it unlikely that the Court could invoke it), that adopting it would also require the Court to toss aside a lot of case law (including, as discussed below, Brown v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 12:00 pm
Fisher-Price & Mattel, the appeals court upholds a district court ruling of obviousness (CAFC 06-1402). [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 12:00 am
Fisher, (9th Cir.; 5/22), the 9th Circuit upheld a prior district court ruling dismissing federal disclosure claims and state law derivative claims on the basis of an exclusive forum bylaw designating the Delaware Court of Chancery as the exclusive forum for derivative suits. [read post]
