Search for: "Fisher v. District Court"
Results 101 - 120
of 913
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2017, 8:14 am
This post examines a recent opinion from the Court of Appeal, Third District, California: The People v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:03 pm
The court noted that Dr. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
Like Caron, Flores creates a split in authority with Fisher v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 5:38 am
The district court said that it would not consider the disparity between state and federal sentences. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 3:08 am
In Fisher v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 1:30 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 1:55 pm
District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 12 Civ. 2234 (LAK). [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 9:06 am
Smith).The 9th remands to the district court to assess the competency of the defendant to waive his right of appeal from his federal death sentence.Ngo v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 7:46 am
Facts: This case (Robert Siegel v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 1:09 pm
Fisher v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:42 am
§§ 45(m), 57b, and 53(b), which purport to grant the FTC the authority to file district court actions for monetary and permanent injunctive relief. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:45 am
The big news from SCOTUS this week was the acceptance of cert in Fisher v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 10:55 am
” United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
” The court cited to Fisher v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
As he observes, the opinion creates a split in authority with Fisher v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 12:32 am
U.S. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 9:30 am
Fisher and Marsha S. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 8:50 am
The litigation was initially filed by franchise law attorneys in Hamilton County Superior Court under Cause No. 29D03-1609-PL-008343 on behalf of Plaintiffs Britt Interactive, LLC and TownePost Network, Inc. of Fishers, Indiana. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 10:14 am
The 9th reverses a district court's ruling precluding 404(b) evidence in an insider trading case. [read post]