Search for: "Fisher v. District Court"
Results 121 - 140
of 913
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2015, 10:14 am
The 9th reverses a district court's ruling precluding 404(b) evidence in an insider trading case. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 10:57 am
Godoy v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:18 am
Coverage continues of the amicus briefs filed earlier this week in Fisher v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 2:45 pm
We therefore affirm the district court’s grant of a preliminary injunction barring their enforcement." [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 1:15 pm
LEXIS 100928 (WD TN, Aug. 2, 2016), a Tennessee federal district court allowed a Muslim inmate to move ahead on his complaint that he was refused a protein supplement when pork was served and was not allowed to eat within the proper time during Ramadan.In Fisher v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 12:36 pm
App. 2005) and the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Fisher v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 2:15 pm
The court noted that Dr. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 9:01 am
The district court felt this was done to punish her for testifying, as was her constitutional right. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:05 pm
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has reversed a district court decision allowing Jose Padilla to sue John Yoo. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 1:02 pm
Here's an entirely just and equitable opinion by Judge Fisher. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 8:31 am
Fisher, 2015 U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 7:40 pm
The District Court also cited Stinson Estate v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 7:40 pm
The District Court also cited Stinson Estate v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 1:21 pm
The second installment of Fisher v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 1:01 pm
” In any event, the retroactivity question in Fisher is an important one that has divided district judges. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 6:18 am
LEXIS 16609 (MD TN, Feb. 11, 2015), a Tennessee federal district court allowed an inmate to proceed with his claim that his jail will not provide religious services for Muslim inmates.In Woodside-Fisher v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 9:19 pm
Fisher and Marsha S. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 9:41 am
The case has set the stage for the first big affirmative action battle since the Supreme Court's 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 8:45 am
Ed. 2d 224 (2006)), The Defendant Jacobsen lost when the Supreme Court agreed with the District Court that the technicians report authenticating the tuning forks and workings of the radar gun were also not testimonial. [read post]
