Search for: "Fisher v. Rule" Results 1 - 20 of 1,443
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
Unusually for statutes (as opposed to judicially crafted doctrines, such as the Miranda rule), the Logan Act is named after the supposed bad guy: Dr. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
The reviewers, however, acknowledged that the available data did not permit them to rule out a risk of HS. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Lisa Heinzerling
In these cases, private commercial fishing companies—whose lawyers are funded by billionaires—challenge a Department of Commerce rule requiring commercial fishers to pay for private onboard observers who make sure that the fishers comply with rules for fisheries management. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Justice Alito, joined by Justice Thomas, dissented from the cert denial in Coalition for TJ v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am by Reference Staff
Non-Native fishers defied the decision and the state often refused to enforce it. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:07 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
(Fisher, Sean) (3rd—C099290) Permanent Disability—Rating—Rebuttal of Scheduled Rating—WCAB, after granting reconsideration, affirmed WCJ’s finding that opinion of applicant’s vocational expert was substantial evidence to rebut scheduled permanent disability rating pursuant to Ogilvie v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 6:09 pm by The White Law Group
Kim purportedly falsely inflated the net worth figures of several customers on their new account forms and other documents so that they appeared eligible to purchase certain speculative investments, in violation of FINRA Rules. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:22 am by Joseph L. Hyde
Fisher, 336 N.C. 684, 703, 445 S.E.2d 866, 877 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1098, 130 L. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:19 am by Jacob Wirz
Liz Fisher confirms the same about England, by saying that its judges “do not talk of deference in the statutory construction context” but rather announce that “questions of law are questions for the court. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Liz Fisher confirms the same about England, by saying that its judges “do not talk of deference in the statutory construction context” but rather announce that “questions of law are questions for the court. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Friends, we are excited to share that the Supreme Court has just taken up Gonzalez v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 Liz Fisher, Professor of Environmental Law, University of Oxford, liz.fisher@law.ox.ac.uk   [read post]