Search for: "Fisher v. Rule"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,442
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2015, 9:09 pm
The Court’s first ruling in Fisher’s case spelled out a new constitutional formula that appeared to impose a more demanding test that public colleges and universities had to meet to support any use of race in the selection of students. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:30 am
Fisher v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:28 am
"Supreme Court ruling in Fisher v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
Several of the amicus briefs filed on Monday in Fisher v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
See, e.g., Frost v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 1:31 pm
Fisher (Duke, Michigan Law) lost Exxon v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 5:48 am
As we explained in Part 1 of our analysis of Fisher v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:02 pm
Fisher v. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 4:07 pm
” Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:26 pm
Two weeks ago I posted some hypotheses about why it was taking the Supreme Court such an unusually long time to publish the opinion in Fisher v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 10:44 am
A Service from the ABA Criminal Justice Section, http://www.abanet.org/crimjust Michigan v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:02 pm
In non-affirmative action cases like Washington v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 3:25 pm
Fisher’s lawyers had taken her constitutional challenge to the Supreme Court, arguing that the university had not justified the race-conscious part of its admissions plan that it adopted in the wake of the 2003 decision by the Justices in a University of Michigan Law School case (Grutter v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:05 am
In Zivotofsky v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:36 pm
In Fisher v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 4:10 pm
The Supreme Court decided an emergency entry case today Michigan v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 7:39 am
The Supreme Court rules against business this week in Kasten v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 12:20 pm
Why did the Supreme Court decide to take Fisher v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:44 am
Earlier this week, in the appeal of Jose Padilla v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 9:39 pm
That’s what the case of Fisher v. [read post]
