Search for: "Fisher v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 977
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2010, 2:14 pm by Ronnie London
By Kelli Sager, Jeffrey Fisher, Rochelle Wilcox, and John (Rory) Eastburg The United States Supreme Court has ruled unanimously that a California city’s audit of a police officer’s text messages was reasonable, and rejected a lawsuit claiming that the review violated the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 10:27 pm
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court announced its decision in Bullcoming v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:08 pm
"UT Austin's Consideration of Race in Admissions is Narrow, Necessary and Constitutional": The University of Texas at Austin today issued a news release that begins, "Today, the University of Texas at Austin filed its brief to the United States Supreme Court as respondent in the case of Fisher v. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 12:02 pm by Rosemary Campagna
The Supreme Court heard arguments in the case Fisher v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 10:47 am by Jamal Greene
United States; and that he supported a principle in his Hamdi v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:42 am by Aaron L. Nielson
United States, 295 U.S. 602, 625-26 (1935). [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:40 am by Lyle Denniston
United States, and a companion case, Sandlin v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:03 pm by Schachtman
Judge Gergel did not report whether Jewell’s reported p-value of 0.0654, was one- or two-sided, but he did state that the attained probability “indicates a lack of statistical significance. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 4:34 am
United States, No. 07-513, decision below 492 F.3d 1212 (11th Cir. 2007), posted here July 18. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
At first blush, the pending Supreme Court case, Fisher v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 7:02 am
(Rendell, Fisher, and Chagares, Circuit Judges) (Fisher, majority; Rendell, dissent)       United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
The United States District Court for the District of Maryland recently issued a Memorandum Opinion in Vance v. [read post]