Search for: "Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin" Results 61 - 80 of 384
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2016, 2:03 am by Amy Howe
University of Texas at Austin, holding that the race-conscious admissions policy in use when Abigail Fisher applied (unsuccessfully) to the university does not violate the Constitution, comes from Lawrence Friedman, who at New England Law Review’s On Remand argues that the ruling “confirms Justice O’Connor’s observation in Grutter v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:03 pm by Mark Graber
University of Texas at Austin, permanently enjoined the enforcement of Obama administration immigration policies in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:30 pm by Schachtman
Worsham Centennial Professor,  University of Texas at Austin School of Law The Interpretation of DNA Evidence: A Case Study in Probabilities prepared by: – David H. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:36 pm by Amy Howe
” Commentary on last week’s decision in Fisher v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 4:30 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on last week’s decision in Fisher v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:56 am by Amy Howe
University of Texas at Austin, holding that the race-conscious admissions policy in use when Abigail Fisher applied (unsuccessfully) to the university does not violate the Constitution. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 2:13 pm by John Paul Schnapper-Casteras
The Supreme Court’s decision yesterday in Fisher v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 1:21 pm by Elise Boddie
University of Texas at Austin is a sound win for diversity and Grutter v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:13 am by Elizabeth Slattery
University of Texas at Austin was disappointing, to say the least. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:05 am by Amy Howe
University of Texas at Austin, holding that the race-conscious admissions policy in use when Abigail Fisher applied (unsuccessfully) to the university does not violate the Constitution, for this blog. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:47 am by Kimberly West-Faulcon
He upheld the race-conscious component of the University of Texas at Austin’s admissions policy as satisfying the stringent strict-scrutiny standard of review. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:27 am by Ernest Young
More importantly, the Court’s agonizingly narrow decision today in Fisher v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
University of Texas at Austin to allow the University of Texas to continue considering race as a factor in admissions. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 6:10 pm by Richard Kahlenberg
University of Texas at Austin supporting racial preferences at the University of Texas at Austin by a four-to-three margin was a shocker. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:07 pm by Andrew Hamm
University of Texas at Austin, holding that the race-conscious admissions program in use when Abigail Fisher applied to the university is lawful under the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:06 pm by Molly Runkle
University of Texas at Austin, holding by a vote of four to three that the race-conscious admissions program in use when Abigail Fisher applied to the university is lawful under the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]