Search for: "Fitts v. Case"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2008, 9:23 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 3:30 pm
In the recent case (Moquin v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 9:31 am
Jenkins v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 4:19 am
Fitte v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 6:24 am
Of the three cases argued yesterday—NASA v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
"[T]he mere fact that close cases can be envisioned" doesn't "render[] a statute vague"—"[c]lose cases can be imagined under virtually any statute. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 9:48 am
"Argument preview: Court to consider liability for DA’s offices on Brady violations," by Jessica Fitts, examines the Louisiana civil case that grows from prosecutorial misconduct, Connick v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 8:00 am
The grant is the unexpected by-product of a decades-old settlement of a major antitrust class action, City of Detroit v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 8:02 am
Thompson, which Jessica Fitts recapped for SCOTUSblog yesterday, has drawn some fresh criticism. [read post]
12 May 2014, 12:38 pm
Under appropriate circumstances, to be determined on a case by case basis, the court may consider whether the more financially secure litigant is, in fact, merely waging a campaign of legal harassment against the more needy party as held in Ardito v Ardito. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm
One is Catherine Fitts, the curator of the court. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 5:42 pm
Herr v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:50 pm
The first case he discussed was Murray v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
“[T]he mere fact that close cases can be envisioned” doesn’t “render[] a statute vague”—”[c]lose cases can be imagined under virtually any statute. [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:58 am
”DiPompeo ran the Law Review successfully, including publishing a comment, "Federal Hate Crime Laws and United States v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request extension for reconsideration (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Patent on sex aid is obvious: Ritchie v Vast Resources (AKA Topco) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Assigning patent rights: Euclid Chemical v Vector Corrosion (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) District Court E D Michigan: LEDdynamics wins summary judgment in LED tube patent suit… [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 7:51 am
For instance, in the case of Nissim Hadjes, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP) Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP) Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark) Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46) Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
Kentucky, 384 U.S. 195 (1966) (holding that Kentucky's common law crime of criminal libel was unconstitutionally void, as no court case had redefined the crime's sweeping language in understandable terms, leaving prosecution decisions to be made on a case to case basis); see also Tollett v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 12:06 pm
Fitts, Dean of Penn Law. [read post]
