Search for: "Fitzpatrick v. Clark"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2011, 3:49 am
SEAN FITZPATRICK, App. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:13 am
Co., 70 N.Y.2d 382, 389, 521 N.Y.S.2d 653, 656 [1987](Clark-Fitzpatrick)). [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:33 am
Clark v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:26 am
“”It is a well-established principle that a simple breach of contract is not to be considered a tort unless a legal duty independent of the contract itself has been violated” (Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v Long Is. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:25 am
” “”It is a well-established principle that a simple breach of contract is not to be considered a tort unless a legal duty independent of the contract itself has been violated” (Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 4:42 am
The unjust enrichment cause of action is precluded by the existence of the retainer agreements (see Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v Long Is. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 12:19 pm
Fitzpatrick & Assocs., Inc., 135 N.J. 349, 358 (1994) (quoting Perini Corp. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
" Citing Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v Long Is. [read post]
Court address claims of breach of contract, negligent termination and defamation alleged by educator
8 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
" The court then opined that even if such a claim existed under New York Law, Williams’s relationship with the District was governed by contract, and the well-established rule is that "a simple breach of contract is not to be considered a tort unless a legal duty independent of the contract itself has been violated," citing Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:28 am
” Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v Long Island R. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 4:51 am
They cite the general rule, promulgated long ago by the Court of Appeals in Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v Long Is. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 4:31 am
” “”It is a well-established principle that a simple breach of contract is not to be considered a tort unless a legal duty independent of the contract itself has been violated” (Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v Long Is. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:25 am
by Dennis Crouch In Teva v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 11:37 am
See, e.g., Clark-Fitzpatrick v. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 6:31 am
Fitzpatrick - UP 1500 2 Democratic Incumbents Not Declared BUT are Ahead GA-08 Jim Marshall - UP 1800 with 99% in GA-12 John Barrow - UP 3300 with 96% in Headed to a Runoff LA-02 Jefferson v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:33 am
Cohen v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 8:11 am
Further, the retainer agreements between plaintiff and the insured govern this dispute, which provides a further basis for affirming the order (Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v Long Is. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 11:54 am
Christine Saba Fawzy v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm
Appeals Bd. ( Fitzpatrick ) (2018) 27 Cal.App.5th 607 , 83 Cal. [read post]
