Search for: "Flast v. Cohen" Results 21 - 40 of 68
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2012, 8:32 am by Lawrence Solum
” Implicitly rejecting intangible, wisdely-shared, “psychic” harms as a basis for standing, the Winn majority held that though taxpayers might have standing to contest legislative appropriations designed to aid religious enterprises as in Flast v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 9:12 am
Among the amici urging the Court simply to overrule Flast v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Cohen that the Establishment Clause will be unenforceable unless we recognize taxpayer standing? [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 2:24 am
Justice Alito writes for the majority plurality in Hein v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 4:20 pm
Judge Wood then discusses Flast v Cohen as the exception to Frothingham...The Flast Court described the concededly limited set of cases in which a litigant would have standing to assert claims solely in her capacity as a taxpayer:First, the taxpayer must establish a logical link between that status and the type of legislative enactment attacked. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 11:48 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 217, 218 (1962); see also Flast v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 5:46 am
Chief Justice Rehnquist later limited Flast in a 1982 case called Valley Forge College v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 6:36 am by Nabiha Syed
Cohen; similarly, Lyle Denniston of this blog reports that after yesterday’s opinion, Flast “appeared to stand alone, in stark and even threatened isolation. [read post]