Search for: "Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2014, 8:53 am by Eric Goldman
  The ruling is a victory for Flo & Eddie, Inc., a corporation that owns the rights to sound recordings made in the 1960s by the musical group The Turtles, including the hit song “Happy Together”; and a defeat for Sirius XM Radio, which tried to convince the court that California law only prohibited unauthorized reproduction and sale, and did not extend to public performances. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 3:49 am by Ben
 As it currently stands, the 2nd Circuit will be reviewing the New York judge's decision with the California case awaiting a result, too.More here http://the1709blog.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/1972-and-all-that-but-does-turtles-win.html and here http://the1709blog.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/turtles-probe-murky-soup-of-pre-1972-us.html and here Flo & Eddie, Inc., v Sirius XM Radio Inc., et al  … [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
CyberLYNK ED Wisc 2014 http://t.co/RHsIKPgxL9 -> Decision denying Sirius' motion for reconsideration Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 10:00 am by James Kachmar
In a lawsuit that was originally filed in 2013 titled, Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 6:20 am by Ben
District Judge Colleen McMahon rejected Sirius’ arguments that Flo & Eddie Inc, controlled by founding band members Howard Kaylan and Mark Volman, did not own copyrights in The Turtles’ recordings such as “Happy Together,” or gave it an “implied” license to play Turtles songs. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 9:02 am by David Oxenford
The decision (available here in a version subject to revision) was reached after the US Court of Appeals certified the question to the state court as being necessary to resolve the appeal of a US District Court decision which had found such a right to exist in a lawsuit brought by Flo & Eddie of the band the Turtles against Sirius XM Radio. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Ben
 Judges Nathan and Netburn also disagreed with Escape's argument that pre-1972 sound recordings should be excluded, with Judge Nathan citing the recent decision in Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. [read post]