Search for: "Florida Power and Light Co. v. Price"
Results 21 - 40
of 60
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
CalPERS appealed, asserting that its individual suit was timely because the three-year time limit was subject to equitable tolling pursuant to American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 8:55 am
Ohio v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
Electric Power Supply Association, 14-840, and EnerNOC, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:55 am
GEORGE BAKER, Appellee. 2nd District.Civil procedure -- Discovery -- Attorney-client privilege -- Trial court departed from essential requirements of law in compelling production of attorney-client privileged documents on basis that documents were relevant and contained information that could not reasonably be obtained from another source -- Unlike the work product doctrine, attorney-client privilege is not defeated by an opponent's showing of relevance and necessityFLORIDA POWER &… [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:20 pm
Since there is little if any political price to pay, and members of minority religions are often without significant political power (as our Holt co-counsel Prof. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:47 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:43 am
The court undertook a state-by-state analysis of all 22 states – Arkansas, Connecticut, Florida (citing a case we sent to Westlaw), Georgia, Illinois (rejecting Dolin v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 3:12 am
Emerson (pictured above) in a case called Federico v Brancato, 2014 NY Slip Op 50902(U) [Sup Ct, Suffolk County June 9, 2014]. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am
” In Bankers Insurance Co. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
The Delaware Supreme Court[1] and federal courts in Florida,[2] New York,[3] Illinois[4] and Georgia[5] have made the BJR available to officers. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
The Delaware Supreme Court[1] and federal courts in Florida,[2] New York,[3] Illinois[4] and Georgia[5] have made the BJR available to officers. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm
In Gertz v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Concord EFS, Inc. 13-63Issue: Whether a plaintiff who purchases directly from a member of a price-fixing conspiracy is necessarily a “direct purchaser” under Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 8:57 am
RFJD Holding Co., Inc. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
Florida, 12-6901, and Thompson v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
