Search for: "Flower v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 374
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2019, 9:45 am by Christopher Tyner
Late last week the United States Supreme Court decided Flowers v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 8:50 am by April Toy
On June 20, 2019, the United States Supreme Court reversed the conviction of Curtis Flowers. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 1:38 pm by James S. Friedman, LLC
  The United States Supreme Court vacated the judgment and remanded the case, but the Mississippi Supreme Court affirmed again. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 10:00 am by Jo Dale Carothers
”  A patent applicant is not entitled to a patent when the claimed invention was “in public use… more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 3:38 am by SHG
In so doing, the Court disregards the rule that “[w]e do not grant a certiorari to review evidence and discuss specific facts,” United States v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 8:20 am by Terese Arenth
Respondent also sells flowers, as a wholesaler of fresh cut flowers for the United States market. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:29 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Why this is working in this way is perfectly summed up in this decision out of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Curtis v. [read post]