Search for: "Flower v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 231
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2008, 3:48 pm
Here is the Third Circuit roundup: United States v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 8:20 am by Terese Arenth
Respondent also sells flowers, as a wholesaler of fresh cut flowers for the United States market. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:29 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Why this is working in this way is perfectly summed up in this decision out of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Curtis v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 2:54 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
On March 2, 2011, Judge Joy Flowers Conti of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania granted a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings in favor of Allstate Insurance Company based upon a Complaint for declaratory relief in the case of Allstate v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 1:17 pm by Larry
United States involves the tariff classification of inexpensive open top glass vessles imported from China. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 12:30 pm by Jeff Kosseff
  On November 14, Judge Joy Flowers Conti of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania denied the motion to suppress. [read post]
6 May 2009, 8:20 am by Terese Arenth
Respondent also sells flowers, as a wholesaler of fresh cut flowers for the United States market. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:36 am by Liz Hayes
The annual event is free to the public and seeks to showcase the current state of LGBTQ rights in the United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 am by Jani
The answer, at least on the outset, is not an obvious one, but was faced by the United Kingdom Court of Appeals over a decade ago.The case in question is 1-800 Flowers Inc v Phonenames Ltd, decided in the very first year of the second millennium, which dealt with the phone number "800-FLOWERS", registered in the US as a trademark in the mid 1980s by the company 800-Flowers Inc. [read post]