Search for: "Flower v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 243
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe:
12 Aug 2010, 8:49 am
United States (Fed. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 5:47 am
The opinion is styled, State Farm Fire & Casualty v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 3:48 pm
Here is the Third Circuit roundup: United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 11:26 am
In Lorenzo v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 11:21 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:55 am
Following United States v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 10:49 am
United States. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
Arlene’s Flowers, Inc.). [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
Why this is working in this way is perfectly summed up in this decision out of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Curtis v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 2:54 pm
On March 2, 2011, Judge Joy Flowers Conti of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania granted a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings in favor of Allstate Insurance Company based upon a Complaint for declaratory relief in the case of Allstate v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 12:13 pm
The case, State of Washington v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 8:04 am
The cases are United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 1:17 pm
United States involves the tariff classification of inexpensive open top glass vessles imported from China. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 12:30 pm
On November 14, Judge Joy Flowers Conti of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania denied the motion to suppress. [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:16 am
United States of America (Federal Recognition) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlT.W. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 5:38 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 7:12 am
The lawsuit, Doe v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:36 am
The annual event is free to the public and seeks to showcase the current state of LGBTQ rights in the United States. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 3:25 pm
From United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 am
The answer, at least on the outset, is not an obvious one, but was faced by the United Kingdom Court of Appeals over a decade ago.The case in question is 1-800 Flowers Inc v Phonenames Ltd, decided in the very first year of the second millennium, which dealt with the phone number "800-FLOWERS", registered in the US as a trademark in the mid 1980s by the company 800-Flowers Inc. [read post]
