Search for: "Flower v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 361
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
Why this is working in this way is perfectly summed up in this decision out of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Curtis v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 2:54 pm
On March 2, 2011, Judge Joy Flowers Conti of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania granted a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings in favor of Allstate Insurance Company based upon a Complaint for declaratory relief in the case of Allstate v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 12:31 pm
The second allegedly defamatory statement identified in the complaint states: Gayla Nesgoda they only truly have one United States location, in New Jersey. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 8:04 am
The cases are United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 1:17 pm
United States involves the tariff classification of inexpensive open top glass vessles imported from China. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 12:30 pm
On November 14, Judge Joy Flowers Conti of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania denied the motion to suppress. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 12:30 pm
On November 14, Judge Joy Flowers Conti of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania denied the motion to suppress. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 12:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:16 am
United States of America (Federal Recognition) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlT.W. v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:16 am
United States of America (Federal Recognition) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlT.W. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:10 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 5:38 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 3:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 8:42 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
In Flowers v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 1:56 pm
ShareFrom the beginning of Monday’s oral argument in Ohio Adjutant General’s Department v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 3:25 pm
From United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 5:03 am
" United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 am
The answer, at least on the outset, is not an obvious one, but was faced by the United Kingdom Court of Appeals over a decade ago.The case in question is 1-800 Flowers Inc v Phonenames Ltd, decided in the very first year of the second millennium, which dealt with the phone number "800-FLOWERS", registered in the US as a trademark in the mid 1980s by the company 800-Flowers Inc. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:21 am
Indeed, in comments proffered on the release of the State Council White Paper Tian Peiyan, the deputy director of the Communist Party's Policy Research Office took great pains to contrast the Chinese path of democratic constitutionalism with that advanced by the United States and its larger camp. [read post]
