Search for: "Flower v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 371
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2022, 12:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
All concede that the cap Eckhardt wore represented a symbol responding to tasteless commentary about women uttered by a United States President. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 1:21 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June 2021… [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:32 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June 2021… [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 1:56 pm by Amy Howe
The question, Keller emphasized, is not what the United States is going to do about COVID-19, but instead who is going to decide what to do. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 9:15 am by Richard Hunt
The internet is everywhere, and most e-commerce websites make products or services available everywhere in the United States. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:34 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October  Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October  Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October  Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October  Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard… [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:21 am
  Indeed, in comments proffered on the release of the State Council White Paper Tian Peiyan, the deputy director of the Communist Party's Policy Research Office took great pains to contrast the Chinese path of democratic constitutionalism with that advanced by the United States and its larger camp. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:23 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard 9th November 2021 FirstPort Property Services Ltd v Settlers Court RTM Company and others heard 10th… [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 6:04 am by John Elwood
First, the parties settled the much-relisted rehearing petition in Arlene’s Flowers Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 1:52 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard 9th November 2021 FirstPort Property Services Ltd v Settlers Court RTM Company and others heard 10th… [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 6:34 am by INFORRM
United States Alex Jones has been found guilty by default in all four defamation cases brought by the families of victims of the Sandy Hook school shooting tragedy. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 12:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Thursday 25th November, the Court will hear the case of Craig v Her Majesty’s Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another, at 10:30 in Courtroom One. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 1:07 pm by John Elwood
United States, 20-1410, and Kahn v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 10:26 am by John Elwood
United States, involves claims of a person convicted of murder arguing he cannot be executed because of his intellectual disability. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:15 am by John Elwood
§ 841(a)(l) as defined in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 9:39 am by Amy Howe
United States, the justices agreed to consider whether a prosecution in the Court of Indian Offenses can trigger the Constitution’s double jeopardy clause. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am by John Elwood
§ 841(a)(l) as defined in United States v. [read post]