Search for: "Flower v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 362
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2023, 2:47 am by Matrix Law
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 19-5652,Smith v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 11:35 am
I am an attorney, licensed to practice law in California (and also to appear in a number of federal courts, including the United States Supreme Court). [read post]
21 Sep 2006, 3:43 am
Flowers by the United States Supreme Court that complained where the government's mailing was returned as undeliverable, it must make other efforts before selling off the person's house to pay tax debts. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 2:14 pm by Andrew Hamm
(The justices considered a request to reconsider their cert denial in a similar case, Arlene’s Flowers Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 1:54 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for The Daily Caller, Jake Warner urges the court to review Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:06 am by Jeff Gamso
Here's how Chief Justice Rehnquist accounted for this sort of mess in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 5:28 am
In lieu of flowers, donations may be sent to the First Presbyterian Church, 305 East Main Street, Durham, NC 27701, for the Robert Daye Habitat for Humanity House.This week at the CCAs: The Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals will hold oral argument on Wednesday in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 9:33 pm by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
 Worse still for the client, the United States Supreme Court decided a case that would have benefitted the client had he raised the argument of improper notice.The court explains the underlying proceedings as follows:"On April 26, 2006, the United States Supreme Court decided Jones v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 6:11 am
Glenn, supra.The Court of Appeals goes on to explain how and why the prosecution arose, what it involved and why Glenn was convicted:Defendant, an officer with the United States Customs and Border Patrol (CBP), worked at the Canada–United States border in Detroit, Michigan, during the relevant year of 2013. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 2:00 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Jan. 24, 2013 Conti, J.), Judge Joy Flowers Conti of the United States District Court For the Western District of Pennsylvania addressed several bad faith issues in the uninsured motorist context. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 1:21 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June 2021… [read post]