Search for: "Flower v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 390
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The United States Supreme Court can’t seem to make up its mind about race. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 2:19 am by Matrix Law
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:49 am
In a rare, contested concurrent use proceeding, the Board awarded junior user ABF concurrent use registrations for the three marks shown below, for hotel and motel services, in the entire United States except for the State of Arizona. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
” A new world was dawning in the United States as well, King said, thanks to the Supreme Court’s 1954 ruling in Brown v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:37 pm by Mark Walsh
But the mood quickly turns serious as Flowers v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 2:47 am by Matrix Law
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 19-5652,Smith v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 11:35 am
I am an attorney, licensed to practice law in California (and also to appear in a number of federal courts, including the United States Supreme Court). [read post]
21 Sep 2006, 3:43 am
Flowers by the United States Supreme Court that complained where the government's mailing was returned as undeliverable, it must make other efforts before selling off the person's house to pay tax debts. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]