Search for: "Flower v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 365
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2021, 6:07 pm
The United States filed its application on October 18. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:54 am
(United States) Coty is a global cosmetic company. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 9:33 am
Flower, No. 1 CA-CV 06-0781 (Ariz. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 9:33 am
Flower, No. 1 CA-CV 06-0781 (Ariz. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 8:35 am
State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:23 am
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard 9th November 2021 FirstPort Property Services Ltd v Settlers Court RTM Company and others heard 10th… [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:56 am
United States, in which a defendant is asking the court to consider the dual-sovereignty exception to the double jeopardy clause of the Constitution that allows state and federal governments to prosecute an individual for the same action. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
Now before the United States Supreme Court and supported by anti-LGBTQ groups, and the United States Department of Justice, the bakery argues that it has a First Amendment right to discriminate based on the owner’s religious beliefs. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 4:31 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 12:18 pm
Plaintiff alleges that Defendants approached Plaintiff about a possible collaboration to distribute the toy outside of the United States, which Plaintiff declined. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:06 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June 2021… [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:50 am
Which in our humble opinion has a good shot of a grant, since the Ninth Circuit's opinion directly conflicts with both Ehrlich and the Texas Supreme Court's opinion in City of Flower Mound v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 8:32 am
As we reported here on September 18, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that couriers providing deliveries for customers of GrubHub were not involved in interstate commerce. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:14 am
Also test your knowledge about jury service in the United States with our five-question quiz on the American jury! [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:32 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June 2021… [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 7:57 am
State v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 7:34 am
The ACLU is direct counsel in the DOMA case, United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:02 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 3:16 am
.: On Monday 6th and Tuesday 7th March 2023 the Court will hear The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilities Water Ltd No 2, on appeal from [2022] EWCA Civ 852. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:16 am
On Wednesday 23rd February, judgment will be handed down in Craig (AP) v Her Majesty’s Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another, on appeal from [2020] HCJAC 22. [read post]
