Search for: "Flower v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 391
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2011, 9:50 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Which in our humble opinion has a good shot of a grant, since the Ninth Circuit's opinion directly conflicts with both Ehrlich and the Texas Supreme Court's opinion in City of Flower Mound v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:14 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Also test your knowledge about jury service in the United States with our five-question quiz on the American jury! [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:32 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June 2021… [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:02 am by Matrix Law
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 3:16 am by Matrix Law
.: On Monday 6th and Tuesday 7th March 2023 the Court will hear The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilities Water Ltd No 2, on appeal from [2022] EWCA Civ 852. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:16 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 23rd February, judgment will be handed down in Craig (AP) v Her Majesty’s Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another, on appeal from [2020] HCJAC 22. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 8:19 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 14/2/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and… [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:52 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 07/2/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and… [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Second, General Dynamics United Kingdom Ltd v State of Libya. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 8:24 pm
United States (SCOTUS) (Clean Water Act jurisdiction) Return to Sender - Elvis and Notice: Jones v. [read post]
30 Dec 2006, 2:29 pm
United States (SCOTUS) (Clean Water Act jurisdiction) Return to Sender - Elvis and Notice: Jones v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:50 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:58 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
Washington, the case of “a Washington State florist who refused for religious reasons to make custom flower arrangements for a same-sex wedding. [read post]
14 May 2012, 5:02 am by Fakhimi & Associates
The one suspect has been arrested on suspicion of arson, which is a violation of Arrest Made in 2010 Arson Attack During Lakers Celebration, By Elizabeth Espinosa, KTLA Los Angeles More Blog Entries: United States v. [read post]