Search for: "Floyd Abrams" Results 101 - 120 of 285
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2017, 8:20 pm by Jon Katz
Snoop Dogg’s video is First Amendment protected — as First Amendment expert Floyd Abrams agrees — which does not automatically mean that it is in good taste. [read post]
10 May 2008, 11:55 am
  Davis Polk & Wardwell recently announced the addition of Ronnie Abrams, former Manhattan US Attorney's Office prosecutor and daughter of renowned First Amendment litigator Floyd Abrams, as its first Special Counsel for Pro Bono. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 9:32 pm by Walter Olson
Noted civil libertarian Floyd Abrams, writing in the WSJ, sees the case as a straightforward one of supporting free speech for a position with which he happens to disagree. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
Originally posted 2005-08-16 13:29:30. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 11:44 pm
" And, check it out, the first one is from Floyd Abrams:Ann Althouse's apologia for the so obviously politically crafted shifts in position on abortion by Rudolph W. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 11:36 am by Marie S. Newman
Yale Law alumnus and legendary constitutional lawyer Floyd Abrams has given his alma mater $3,000,000 to found an institute to promote free speech, free press, and access to information. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:03 am
In today's Wall Street Journal:The case offers two enduring lessons. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 1:18 pm
Floyd Abrams is one of the nation's most famous First Amendment lawyers. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:54 am by Joe May
McKissick, Jr., Floyd Abrams, Partner Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, and Jamie Raski, Professor of Law and Director of the Law and Government Program at American University, Washington College of Law. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:46 pm by Legal Talk Network
Schulz is a senior research scholar in law and Floyd Abrams clinical lecturer in Law at Yale Law School and co-director of the Media Freedom and Information Access (MFIA) Clinic. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 9:43 am by Allan Blutstein
 “The Second Circuit’s decision that records used by a federal agency are exempt from disclosure under FOIA if they were obtained from a party that wanted them to remain confidential stands FOIA’s disclosure mandate on its head,” said Floyd Abrams Lecturer in Law and MFIA Director David Schulz ’78. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:52 am
Check out this infuriating article by First Amendment scholar Floyd Abrams over at Index on Censorship. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm by Dan Ernst
  To date it includes, in addition to Collins’s foreword, contributions by Louis Michael Seidman, Kathryn Watts, Floyd Abrams, Adam White, Erwin Chemerinsky, Roger Pilon, Richard Epstein. [read post]
18 May 2016, 11:06 am by Rebecca Tushnet
– 2:30 p.m.) the Floyd Abrams Institute for Freedom of Expression will host a major conference on the commercial speech doctrine. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
(Hat tip: Arts & Letters Daily)In the Los Angeles Review of Book, you'll find a review of Friend of the Court: On the Front Lines with the First Amendment (Yale University Press), by attorney and law professor Floyd Abrams. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 9:32 pm by Anupam Chander
EFF, Stop the Internet Blacklist Legislation Mozilla et al Letter on SOPA Law Professors' Letter in Opposition to SOPA (I signed the letter) TechDirt's Mike Masnick, Open Letter to Chris Dodd   Floyd Abrams' testimony in defense of the Protect IP Act   [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:21 am by David Lat
Because the talk was sponsored by my rather left-leaning alma mater, I expected the answer to the question presented to be “Mountain” — and not just any…Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Conferences / Symposia, Election Law, Floyd Abrams, Free Speech, Law Professors, Politics, SCOTUS, Supreme Court, Yale Law School [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 12:10 am
First Amendment lawyer guru Floyd Abrams has his doubts and calls the order "extraordinary. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 11:15 am by Sheldon Toplitt
., claim their First Amendment rights would be violated by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act of 2009 [H.R. 1256], which would require them to display graphic images of the health dangers of smoking in advertising and on their packaging.First Amendment attorney Floyd Abrams, who represents the plaintiffs, told LegalTimes the FDA regs constitute anti-smoking advocacy by the government, rather than merely requiring disclosure of uncontroversial facts. [read post]