Search for: "Ford Motor Co. v. Campbell" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2012, 2:38 pm
  Or, perhaps, an admittedly clouded one (like mine).The Court of Appeal holds that Ford Motor Company can't be sued for giving Mary Campbell mesothelioma because she never visited or worked in Ford's plant. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
We received a copy of Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
We received a copy of Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
We received a copy of Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
We received a copy of Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 10:05 am
Ford Motor Co., 113 P.3d 82, 94-95 (Cal. 2005) (applying Campbell to reject "aggregate disgorgement"); Engle v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 6:02 am
Ford Motor Co., 113 P.3d 82, 94-95 (Cal. 2005) (rejecting "aggregate disgorgement"); Engle v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:02 am by Stephen M. Fuerch
Ford Motor Co., where the court ruled against the relative of an independent contractor who laundered the clothes of two people (her father and brother) who were exposed to asbestos at Ford’s facility. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
Ford Motor Co., 113 P.3d 82, 94-95 (Cal. 2005) (Campbell precludes something called "aggregate disgorgement," which the court analogized to punitive damages); Engle v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 10:51 am
Ford Motor Co., 35 Cal.4th 1191,113 P.3d 82 (Cal. 2005) (rejecting aggregate disgorgement); Engle v. [read post]