Search for: "Ford v. Superior Court (1986)" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
On Oct. 15, the Superior Court handed down its much anticipated decision in the automobile accident case of Stepanovich v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
On Oct. 15, the Superior Court handed down its much anticipated decision in the automobile accident case of Stepanovich v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 3:44 pm by Bryan West
Contrary to Inesco, a 1986 decision of the Ontario Superior Court, school portables can constitute a lienable improvement in the right circumstances – despite being “inherently impermanent” additions to land. 2. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am by Carolina Attorneys
While represented by counsel, the Shireys voluntarily bargained for and agreed upon a settlement on all issues of alimony, child custody and support, and equitable distribution, which was reduced to writing, signed by all parties and was jointly presented to the court and entered as a Consent Order in the Mecklenburg County Clerk of Superior Court on 24 May 2016. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 11:07 am by Jeff Gamso
  And so the Supreme Court said that while it's not OK to kill the insane, it's perfectly fine to kill crazy people as long as they aren't insane in a particular way.The Court decided Ford v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:32 am
Appointed by Republican President Gerald Ford in 1975 and unanimously confirmed by the Senate, he served on the Court for more than 34 years. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:32 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Quebec invoked it routinely under the Parti Québécois as a form of political protest, and then notably in 1988, following the Supreme Court of Canada decision Ford v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Superior Court, 79 P.3d 556, 563 (Cal. 2003).Lower California courts, but not the California Supreme Court, have cited Restatement Third §2 with approval. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am by MOTP
Unless appellate courts come up with some grandfathering doctrine to exempt claims that would not have been time-barred before the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Agar Corp. v Electro Circuits. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Eddins & Lee Bus Sales, Inc., 491 So.2d 942, 944 (Ala. 1986); Jones v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:45 am
The Court had asked for briefing on whether Jackson should be overturned in the context of Montejo v. [read post]