Search for: "Forms, Inc., v. American Standard, Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 1,210
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
In this sense, our contemporary business civilization is founded on moral consequentialist justifications in the form of welfare economics. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:35 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Under the former, in Glenn v Hoteltron Sys., Inc. (74 NY2d 386 [1989]), New York’s highest court held that a fee award to a successful derivate plaintiff is a liability of the entity on behalf of whom the plaintiff sued, not the defendant(s) the plaintiff actually sued. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Supreme Court articulated the meaning of materiality in cases in the 1970s and 1980s.[9] It is this standard of materiality that is reflected in Commission rules.[10]This materiality standard is reflected when materiality appears in numerous disclosure rules governing registration statements and public company periodic and current reports.[11] In the 90 years since Roosevelt described the intent of the federal securities laws and the 40 years since Jack’s paper, the core… [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
While the format for pleadings could be standardized to some degree, they are generally sufficient in framing the dispute, namely, setting forth the facts as relied upon by each side, and informing the other parties of the case they must meet. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Tagging AI training content may prove less challenging than, say, scanning all the books in the world’s libraries.[18]  For one, such tagging could leverage existing metadata so as to drive scale, and take advantage of existing standardization so as to promote interoperability across platforms, as well as traceability for misinformation researchers and public safety officials. [read post]
Shearson/American Express, Inc.) that, when its own past rulings seem to be out of step with the Court’s current direction, lower federal courts should continue to adhere to past Court decisions when they are clearly on point, and leave the (expected) overruling of such cases to the Court itself. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 8:00 am by Sasha Volokh
Here's the abstract: In the wake of Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
Considering the motion to set aside the judgment, it determined that the plaintiff failed to meet the standard under Rule 60(b) and that finality concerns outweighed any impact the undisclosed evidence may have had. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Health Plan Excess Fee Case Filed Against Johnson and Johnson In Lewandowski v. [read post]