Search for: "Forrest v. Forrest" Results 61 - 80 of 468
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2021, 7:14 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Judge Rakoff joins other Southern District of New York judges, including Judge Forrest in Goldman v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 2:54 am
  The district court does the former; the defendants appeal; a panel opinion back in April says whoa, hold on, I'm not so sure that the case should be certified, and now the Ninth Circuit takes the thing en banc.All of which is fine.The fun thing about the order taking the case en banc, however, is that seven different active Ninth Circuit judges recuse themselves from the en banc vote:  the aforementioned Judges McKeown, Wardlaw, Berzon, Owens, Miller, Collins, Bress, and… [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 9:28 am by Aaron Moss
With his decision, Rakoff became the second SDNY judge to reject the server test, joining a view shared by then-judge Katherine Forrest in 2018’s Goldman v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiff’s allegations that the Judge who denied his workers’ compensation claim and/or the Workers’ Compensation Board would have credited certain evidence, including the testimony of alleged eyewitnesses, if such evidence had been presented by the defendants were speculative and conclusory (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d at 910; Cusimano v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP, 118 AD3d 542). [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 5:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the complaint (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910; Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 847). [read post]
22 May 2021, 7:12 am by Florian Mueller
No, I don't want to gloat, but it's mind-boggling what happened yesterday in that Oakland courtroom at the end of the main part (they're done apart from closing arguments on Monday) of the Epic Games v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 3:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, the complaint failed to state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice and the defendants were entitled to dismissal of that cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d at 909; Benishai v Epstein, 116 AD3d at 728). [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 12:25 pm by Herrman & Herrman, P.L.L.C.
They include the Subaru Outback, the Subaru Forrester, and the Subaru Crosstrek Hybrid. [read post]