Search for: "Fortenberry v. State" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2015, 5:25 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Fortenberry, John Fortenberry, and Johnny Fortenberry)Administrative Proceeding File No.: 3-15858Case filed: April 28, 2014Initial Decision: March 2, 2015Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 7, 2015 5/29/2015 8/27/2015 2015-47 SEC v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:55 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
First State Bank of Deanville, 747 S.W.2d 783, 785 (Tex. 1988)); Pitts & Collard, L.L.P. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
Fortenberry, 530 So.2d 688, 692 (Miss.1988); Hill v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Fortenberry, 530 So.2d 688, 691-92 (Miss. 1988).Missouri: Krug v. [read post]